However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The Defendant: (a) operated the “D” in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (A)-413; and (b) subcontracted the construction of electric cables and communications from the construction site of Songpa-gu to August 2016 from September 2014 to the construction site of Songpa-gu (hereinafter “F”); and (c) received telecommunications cables from the Victim G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) after receiving a subcontract for all construction of electric cables and communications from the F (hereinafter “F”).

On May 6, 2016, at a place where the location is unknown, the Defendant called “H, a person in charge of the victim’s company, to supply 100 items, 5C-HBT (CW) 6,000 items for each 100 UTP-CAT-CAT-5-EN-4 [BL], a telecommunications cable, to supply 11,682,00,00 won for outstanding amounts and additional orders for cable payments immediately received from F if the cable is supplied.”

However, at the time of fact, the construction cost to be paid from F has not been determined, and the defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the outstanding amounts and additional cable payments to the victim company, as well as the outstanding amounts of KRW 182,895,280 to the victim company, as well as the amount of KRW 145,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 have been paid for the loan to the victim company, and the labor cost required for all telecommunications and telecommunications construction works has increased, and even if the telecommunications cables are additionally supplied by the victim company

Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving the victim company as above and thereby, he received communications cables equivalent to KRW 11,682,00 from the victim company. From around that time to June 16, 2016, 10 times in total as shown in the annexed crime sight table.