A Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

Co., Ltd.

Defendant

A is the representative director of the defendant corporation B, a manufacturing chain, such as the lighting equipment located in Seocheon-si D 303 Dong 208.

1. Defendant A

A. The arrears in the payment of retirement allowances (2016 high group 2989) is an employer who operates Defendant B Co., Ltd. on a commercial basis and operates manufacturing business using seven full-time workers at the above workplace. On June 21, 2016, each of the retired workers E’ retirement allowances of KRW 31,327,01,01, worker F’s retirement allowances of KRW 31,83,754, and worker G’s retirement allowances of KRW 38,620,691 were not paid within 14 days from the date of the above retirement without any agreement between the parties on the extension of the payment deadline.

B. In arrears with national pension insurance premiums (2016 Highest 3419), the Defendant, at the office of the Defendant on July 22, 2016, at the office of the Defendant, and the head of the office of the office of the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, the head of the office of the office of the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs (201,521,510 won in total for employees specified in

8. Although the notice of urging to pay to 10.10, the notice was received, it did not pay it by the above payment deadline without good cause.

(c)

Around December 2016, the Defendant: (a) around December 2016, 201; (b) around 1568, ELD et al., the total market value of which is 55 million won owned by the Defendant in the foregoing Defendant’s business; and (c) around November 29, 2016, the enforcement officer H affiliated with the Busan District Court’s Branch Branch Branch of the company was delegated by the creditor E with the enforcement of the foregoing support; and (d) even though the foregoing movable properties were attached by the original provisional attachment decision of movable properties (the appointed party) and attached the provisional attachment, the Defendant removed the provisional attachment indication from the Defendant’s business by ordering I, who is the person in charge of the production of the Defendant, and then exported the foregoing movable properties to the United States’s non-permanent location.

Accordingly, the defendant has harmed the effectiveness of the provisional attachment indication that the public official performed in relation to his duties.

2. Defendant B (the 2016 highest order 3419) Defendant B, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1-b. Defendant’s representative, at the time and place specified in paragraph 1-b.