The defendant, together with B, committed a theft by carrying 40 litresponding from around 15:00 on June 13, 2014 to around 06:00 on June 16, 16, 200 of the same month in transit of the market price of 664,00 litresponding from the oil tank owned by the victim D at the site of Boan City Gas Control Corporation from around 15:0 of the same month to around 06:00 of the same month, into the water tank possessed by the defendant, and loaded 40 litresponding

6. From 25. 07:30 until 07:30, victims’ property was stolen on a total of four occasions, as stated in the list of offenses.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statements made against B in the first protocol of trial;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of respective Acts and subordinate statutes of F, G and H;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes [the scope of recommending punishment] The reason for sentencing under Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is [the scope of larceny for general property] and the basic area (6 months to 1 year and 6 months) [the final scope of sentencing due to the aggravation that there is no special person]: The punishment range due to the aggravation of multiple crimes: six months to nine months [the decision of sentencing] imprisonment, one year to nine months, and one year to nine months,

However, even though the defendant was already punished several times for the same crime, the defendant committed the crime in this case, and the contents of the crime are also combined with two persons and thus, the crime is bad.

In addition, damage recovery has not been made, and there has been no agreement with victims.

Therefore, since it is reasonable to sentence the defendant to the punishment, the above sentence shall be determined.