(a) recognition and public notice of the project - Name of the project: B development project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): Public notice - A, etc. of voice group on January 6, 2012 - Project operator: Defendant

(b) The ruling of expropriation made on November 26, 2013 by the Chungcheongbuk-do Regional Land Expropriation Committee on the object of expropriation - The object of expropriation is D 936 square meters, E, 651 square meters, F,641 square meters, G, 744 square meters, H, H, 460 square meters, 3,629 square meters prior to J, 655 square meters prior to K, 923 square meters, L, 98 square meters prior to L, M, 886 square meters, 886 square meters prior to N, 579 square meters, P1, 421 square meters prior to Q, 385 square meters (hereinafter referred to as the “instant land”) and compensation for expropriation of the instant land: The compensation for expropriation of the instant land - the appraisal corporation and the appraisal corporation of each of the instant land - the compensation for expropriation of KRW 2501,540,529,510,529,50

(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on June 19, 2014 - The details of the ruling: Dismissal - The appraisal corporation: Vice-Governor of the appraisal corporation among the appraisal corporations, the decision-making corporation’s decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-making decision-

2. The assertion and judgment

A. Of the Plaintiff’s assertion, the actual status of the part, the land category of which is “,” is all the “pre-paid,” and the compensation for expropriation should be calculated according to the actual status. However, the compensation for losses for the land of this case, which was determined by the adjudication of expropriation and the ruling of this case, is not properly reflected in the current status of the land of this case, or excessively underpaid because it was not properly applied to the selection of comparative standards or the application of individual factors and other factors. The compensation for losses for the obstacles of this case is also assessed excessively under-paid because the type and quantity of obstacles are omitted, and the basis for price calculation is unclear. Thus,