A. In relation to the insult crime in the judgment of the court below (misunderstanding of facts), whether the Defendant provided a flag to the victim on the old day.

How is the calculation of management expenses.

“The term of this case” is only a finite finite finite finite finite finite finite.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the above facts guilty is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

B. The prosecutor (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s sentence (an amount of KRW 4 million) is too unhued and unfair.

2. Determination

A. According to the records of this case on July 17, 2018, the defendant filed an appeal against the judgment of the court below on July 17, 2018, and on August 3, 2018, the defendant failed to submit a statement of grounds for appeal within the submission period of 20 days as provided in Article 361-3(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act even though he/she was lawfully notified of the record of trial by the court. The petition of appeal does not state the grounds for appeal, and the petition of appeal does not contain any grounds for ex officio examination on records, and it is necessary to decide to dismiss the defendant's appeal in accordance with Article 361-4(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, once rendering a judgment on the prosecutor's appeal, it is decided to separately decide to dismiss the appeal against the defendant and make a joint decision without examining the decision to dismiss the defendant's appeal ( even if the court below's preliminary examination on the above argument by the defendant, which lawfully adopted and investigated the evidence of the court below, and it is reasonable to accept the judgment 20.