Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

except that the ruling shall be made for one year from the date of the final judgment.

가. 사실오인, 법리오해 ① 피해자는 본건 모욕죄에 대한 고소를 하지 아니하였으며, 문어빡빡이 라는 표현은 비아냥, 조롱에 불과하고, 사회적 평가를 저하시키거나 경멸 감정을 표현한 것은 아님에도 모욕죄를 인정한 원심판단은 부당하고, 또한 사회상규에 반하지 아니하여 그 위법성이 조각된다.

(2) The defendant did not have the intention of insult, and the place where the defendant posted his/her writing shall not be able to perform his/her duties on eight singlexs.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (the fine of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on misconception of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

A. (1) The Defendant asserted the same purport in the lower court as above, and the lower court specifically determined the part on the determination of the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion in the judgment.

In light of the evidence duly adopted and examined in the original judgment and the records of this case, it is justifiable to examine the original judgment closely.

B. (1) In order to establish the offense of insult, there is a perception that a person is openly insulting, dolusent intent is sufficient, and does not require the intention or purpose of the injury.

8명의 단톡방에서 피해자에 대해 문어빡빡이라는 표현을 사용한 피고인에게는 모욕의 인식이 있었다

Since the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

(2) 모욕죄의 공연성이라 함은 불특정 또는 다수인이 인식할 수 있는 상태를 말하는바, B 단체 카카오대화방(8인)에서 피고인이 피해자를 문어빡빡이라 한 것은 위 조건을 충분히 충족한다

Since this part of the defendant's assertion is groundless.

C. Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake and misapprehension of legal principles is groundless.

3. The victim wishes to be punished after the agreement with the defendant when determining the allegation of unfair sentencing.