except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant thought that the victim B (70 years of age) who is a neighboring resident) sold a house to C around August 1990, while selling it to C, the defendant sold it as a dry field of the defendant, and thereafter, C did not have good appraisal of the victim on the ground that there was a cause for the damage.

At around 09:00 on September 22, 2018, the Defendant: (a) held a fished fish of the length of “the victim in front of the house located in Gangwon-gun D; (b) was sold at the time of selling the house; (c) the Defendant, “I would like to see why I would like to see why I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see when I would like to see that I would like to see the victim’s false remarks; and (d) when I would like to see the face of the victim one time, I would like to see the victim about 14-day treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police as to B;

1. Photographs description related to the case to be injured;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that he/she has been punished for the same kind of crime, the fact that the defendant recognizes the crime of this case, the degree of injury suffered by the victim is relatively minor, the favorable circumstances such as the fact that he/she agreed with the victim, and other favorable circumstances such as the character and conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, etc. of this case, and all of the sentencing conditions