When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Except as otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts, no person shall lend any access medium with the receipt, request or promise of compensation.

Nevertheless, on September 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a person who was in the name of the deceased; (b) that “The Defendant shall return 3 million won per one account after using 30,000 won for the lending of e-mail card connected to the bank account; (c) around September 7, 2017, the Defendant issued the e-mail card and password connected to the e-mail bank account under the name of the Defendant to the non-party in front of the Defendant’s home located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si; and (d) via Kwikset Service news article.

Accordingly, the defendant agreed to receive compensation and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Details of text shooting data, output data to be seen in Kakao Stockholm, bank entry and withdrawal details, replys requesting issuance of a report processing slip, and bank transactions;

1. Application of seizure records and statutes concerning the list of seizure;

1. Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The crime of transferring accessible media under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act for the reason of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the custody of the workhouses is a means to facilitate other crimes committed against many and unspecified persons, such as Bosing, and taking into account the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is against each other