A. The Defendant purchased an automobile listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant automobile”) from a land manager, and registered the ownership transfer in the name of the Plaintiff pursuant to the title trust agreement between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff who was de facto in a de facto marital relationship after divorce, and the Defendant operated the instant automobile.

B. On May 28, 2018, the instant complaint containing an expression of intent to terminate the title trust on the instant automobile was served on the Defendant on May 28, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, since the above title trust was lawfully terminated on May 28, 2018, the Defendant is obligated to take over from the Plaintiff the transfer registration procedure for the instant automobile on May 28, 2018.

Although the defendant alleged that the plaintiff would accept the name of the automobile of this case, it is unreasonable to make the claim of this case even though the plaintiff refused to do so, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff refused to transfer ownership, and even if the plaintiff refused to make the defendant's proposal at the time, it is difficult to view that the plaintiff expressed his intention to hold the ownership of the automobile of this case finally.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is accepted as reasonable.