위증
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.
The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) there was a fact that the Defendant entered into a sales contract or exchange contract on the land E (hereinafter “instant land”) owned by C; and (b) the Defendant delegated the authority to dispose of the instant land and to the Corporation; and (c) the Defendant was not guilty by failing to make a false statement contrary to memory.
2. Determination on the grounds for appeal
A. On July 21, 2010, around 15:00, the Defendant was present as a witness of the lawsuit claiming acquisition of money against the said court, Plaintiff C, and Defendant Down Housing Reconstruction Association, and gave testimony at the Seoul High Court court No. 506 in Seocho-gu Seoul, Seocho-gu., Seoul, the summary of the facts charged.
피고인은 위 사건을 심리 중인 위 법원 제6민사부 재판장의 ‘이 사건 원고가 증인의 채권자라고 하였는데, 증인이 원고로부터 언제, 얼마를 빌렸나요’라는 질문에 ‘2008. 11월 또는 12월에 4,500만원, 2009. 4월 또는 5월에 1,500만원을 빌렸습니다. 원고가 부동산이 많은데 그 부동산을 넘겨주기로 해서 그렇게 했습니다.’라고 증언하고, 이어 재판장의 ‘이 채권과 원고의 부동산을 교환하는 것인가요’라는 질문에 ‘그렇습니다’라고 증언하고, 재판장의 ‘채권을 주고 무슨 부동산을 샀나요’라는 질문에 ‘산 것 아니고, 파주시 E 토지를 넘겨주기로 했습니다. 그 외 공사 권한이라든가 매매 권한을 다 위임했습니다. 제가 다 가지고 있습니다’라고 증언하였다.
However, in fact C did not have concluded a sales contract or exchange contract with the defendant for E land owned by C (hereinafter “instant land”) and did not have delegated the defendant with the authority to dispose of the said land and the construction work.
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.
(b) the board 1.