양수금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 376,495,641 among the Plaintiff and KRW 146,616,55 among them, shall be from July 15, 2019 to July 24, 2019.
1. According to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, determination on the cause of the claim, the defendant can be acknowledged that the defendant borrowed KRW 215 million from C.C. on December 14, 2010; C.C. merged with D. on July 1, 2013; D. on December 31, 2015, transferred the claim for loans to the defendant to the plaintiff; on July 14, 2019, the defendant notified the defendant of the transfer; on July 14, 2019, the unpaid principal and interest of KRW 376,495,641 ( principal, KRW 146,616,555, interest29,879,086), interest rate of KRW 376,495,641, and interest rate of KRW 146,651 and interest rate of KRW 146,655,00,086, whichever is equivalent to the annual interest rate of KRW 2015,519,7.
2. The defendant's assertion that the above loan was made about the construction site of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E-ground. The defendant asserts to the purport that it is improper to claim the remainder of the loan against the defendant, even though he collected part of the loan through an auction of secured real estate, by evaluating the value of secured real estate in an unsatisfyed state to settle F's debt through loan hub G in collusion with the lender F.
However, it is not sufficient to recognize the defendant's assertion that the testimony of the witness H was made illegally, and even if there are such circumstances, the defendant is obligated to repay the loan to the plaintiff who acquired the claim for the loan as the debtor, as long as the defendant provided real estate under his own name as collateral and received the loan, so long as the defendant received the loan, the above argument by
3. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim is reasonable.