beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.01.19 2016고단2318

업무상과실치사

Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

The Defendant is a doctor within the hospital B of this case.

On June 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 16:40, in the emergency hospital C located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si; (b) 7 years of age, while driving a vehicle in the parking lot on the same day, was parked and parked after the vehicle; and (c) was sent to the emergency room through 119, and the victim Dodd (39 years of age) who complained of the lavers.

At the time, the victim was transported to an emergency room without being able to know the patient's condition, and the victim's wife E complained of extreme pains more than 6 times due to the pain continued for more than 3 hours, and there was an opinion of an empty blood relative less than 11.5g/dL, so in such a case, the private defendant in the internal department is doubtful about the possibility of low-tension by blood transfusion and low-blood shock, and the non-culp fever resulted in a fatal result from most of the occurrence, but most of the death. Although there was a duty of care to examine the patient's condition continuously by performing an additional examination such as CT, which is the most basic part to find a more accurate cause, or by taking at least the measure of hospitalization, the victim and the victim's wife E complained of heavy pains at least 6 times, and the 10th of the surgery continued to be transported by the victim without additional treatment, such as an additional surgery to 10th of the 196th of the 10th of the 20th of the 19th of the 10th of the death.

2. The Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency’s appraisal report (Evidence No. 3 - the appraisal report), the F hospital president’s response to the preparation of the evidence list (Evidence No. 5 - the medical record appraisal statement);