변호사법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
Seized evidence 12 through 16 shall be confiscated.
From the defendant 52,300.
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 2015, the Defendant violating the defense justice ought to work for the police officers controlling the operation of sexual traffic establishments to E at the D coffee shop located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon.
In Daejeon, there are 7 teams in charge of controlling sexual traffic by adding up to the local offices, and in order to carry out the official work, it is necessary at least one million won per police station.
In order to perform official work at the police station on the five parts other than the two teams of the police station which does not contact the inner beer, it is necessary to KRW 5 million per month.
“Around August 5, 2015, the Plaintiff received KRW 31,300,000 from E as well as KRW 2200,000 from around that time to February 6, 2016, on a total of 25 occasions under the pretext of the instant solicitation, as shown in the list of crimes in attached Form.
As a result, the defendant received money and valuables in favor of the cases handled by public officials.
2. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Arrangement, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (e.g., brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts), the Defendant planned to engage in commercial sex acts in E and Seo-gu, Daejeon, to transfer KRW 15 million to an account in the name of an authorized broker G on October 15, 2015.
The Defendant, in collusion with E on January 2016, placed several rooms on the instant officetels, employed H and I, placed an advertisement using an Internet site where sexual traffic business establishments, such as K, etc. are publicized, while operating a sexual traffic business establishment under the trade name of “J”. The Defendant, upon receiving 130,000 won or 330,000 won as a price for commercial sex acts against unspecified female customers who discovered the advertisement, assisted them to have sexual intercourse with the said commercial sex acts from around that time to March 2016, and provided them with funds of KRW 15,00,000,000,000, while knowing that the said officetels was provided for commercial sex acts.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's person;