If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On March 13, 2012, the Defendant: (a) obstructed ecopic vehicles driven by the victim D (the victim D) from a one-way passage road at KRW 22:10 on March 13, 2012; (b) cut off from the said D’s defect; and (c) plucked off D’s hand, plucked off D’s hand; and (d) committed assault by plucking, harming, or pushed down D’s hand.

2. Around 22:40 on March 13, 2012, the Defendant: (a) expressed to G (29 years of age, female) a desire to look at personal information, etc. for the investigation of the case within the Suwon-si F box; and (b) the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim while the police officers, such as D et al. al. al., were able to have been able to look at the 29 years of age, and “the 19 years of age, e.g., e., the e., the e., the e.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to D and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act (the point of violence and the selection of fines) concerning the facts constituting an offense, the choice of punishment, and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The summary of the charge of interference with the business among the charges of this case, which is part of the charge of non-violation of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, is that "the defendant interfered with the business by force for about 30 minutes in order to prevent the victim D from driving a eco-do vehicle while driving the eco-do vehicle in the middle of drinking at around 22:10 on March 13, 2012."

Therefore, work in the health team and the crime of interference with business refers to work or business continuously engaged in in social status, and for the purpose of working, social status and continuity must be equipped.

This is distinguished from the work of a criminal negligence, and D driving of the copier vehicle is social.