On February 2, 2011, the Defendant, with respect to the New Construction Work B (hereinafter “instant construction”), came to know D with the head of the headquarters of the C&C project, and, under the pretext of receiving a factory construction (hereinafter “factory construction”) among the instant construction works, had the E (E) representative receive the name “the E (E) Chairperson” from the E (E) representative to receive the factory construction in the name of E (State) operated by the Defendant, and had the Defendant receive the factory construction in the name of E (State) and then receive the payment for the installation works, he/she had the victim F access to the money to receive the said payment.

1. On May 31, 201, the Defendant: (a) at a coffee shop where it is impossible to know the trade name in the face of the voice group of the Chungcheongbuk-gun; and (b) at the time, the facts did not intend to conclude that the Defendant would receive a contract for the construction of the factory from D; and (c) even if the Defendant received money from the victim due to the lack of funds or capabilities to operate the E (ju) or to receive construction works, the Defendant did not have an intent or ability to allow the victim to receive a contract for the construction of the factory in the name of E (ju); (d) the Defendant was involved in the new construction project ordered by the (ju)C while operating the E (ju). Since the head of the headquarters took advantage of the trend, D was friendly for a long time, and the head of the association and the head of the association have completed an interference with the owner of the construction project. In conclusion of the construction contract in the name of E (ju), the Plaintiff was granted a total of KRW 500,15 million in the name of the Defendant No.

2. On June 13, 2011, the Defendant is seeking to enter into a contract in the name of G (State) that is another construction company on this opportunity, in a place where it is not known to him/her around June 13, 201, in order for the victim to be aware of the fact that he/she did not receive any payment from the victim as described in paragraph 1 even if he/she received any payment from the victim, and that part of the photograph of “(State)C” would bring about objection to E