If the Defendants did not pay each of the above fines, 50.

From around 21:40 to 21:55 on July 20, 2013, the Defendants: (a) determined the order of priority by dividing the number of each E company located in Pyeongtaek-si into the first floor of E company located in Pyeongtaek-si by dividing the seven cards in the order of the card and changing the number by using 52 cards; and (b) 2,000 won for 2, etc., 3,000 won for 3,00 won for 15 times by paying 1,00 won to 1,00 won for 2,49,000 won for 3,00 won for 15 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Seizure record and list;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 246 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition in consideration of the relationship between the Defendants in the reason of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, the circumstances leading to gambling, and the amount of gambling.