However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a dump truck.

On March 31, 2017, the Defendant, at around 06:50 on March 31, 2017, proceeded with a three-lane road in front of the shooting distance of the head of the self-employed, which is located in 297, as a national company, at a speed that is impossible to be known at the end of the two-lane from the tent to the gradical outflow of the door.

At the time, there was a new wall and there was an intersection where signal lights are installed, so the driver had a duty of care to safely drive the front door and the left and right while observing the signal.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the vehicle signal to a red signal, but continued as it was due to the negligence of the Defendant’s failure, and followed the Defendant’s truck driving direction by two-lanes from the surface of the gate to the gate of the road, from the surface of the road, the front part of the motor vehicle driven by the Defendant was driven by the victim C(28 tax) who driven two-lanes.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as mination of flusium executives on the left-hand side in need of approximately 12 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Each investigation report (the sequence 10, 11 of the evidence list);

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing accident scene photographs;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment without prison labor, concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (see, e.g., that the defendant is led to confession and reflect, that the vehicle for driving the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance, that the defendant has no record of the same punishment as or higher than that of the suspension