2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, the court below stated to the effect that Co-Defendant B made a false statement as stated in the facts charged in this case at the defendant's request, although Co-Defendant B did not witness the injury case at the investigation agency and the court below, and was sentenced to conviction of perjury due to such criminal facts, the victim I stated to the effect that he did not have been at the scene at the time of the above case at the investigation agency, and the witness K's statement also corresponds to I's above statement, and the defendant was sentenced to judgment of conviction based on the above I, K's statement in the injury case, etc., the defendant led the defendant to the defendant at the prosecutor's office and the court of the court of the court below, and the defendant led the defendant to confession or coercion to the defendant in this case. Considering that there are no special circumstances to deem that each confession or coercion was involved, the defendant's assertion is sufficient to recognize that the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory as stated in the facts charged in this case.

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the appeal is without merit.