However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 23:40 on April 14, 2013, the Defendant, at the main point of “D,” located in Seojin-gu, Seojin-gu, Seojin-gu, Seoul, took a bath to the employees and customers of the said main point, etc., and was in contact with E, the business owner of the said main point, and was found to be the victim F (the age of 43) and the body fighting.

The Defendant collected the beer’s disease on the table of the above beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the above beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer of the beer.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things and damaged the victim's salves that require medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Consideration under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the confession of and reflect against the crime, the victim and the victim do not want the punishment of the defendant, and the fact that there is no criminal record exceeding the fine prior to the crime of this case)

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( repeatedly considering the favorable circumstances);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;