업무상횡령
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the lower court (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Although the Defendant recognized his mistake, the crime of embezzlement of this case is deemed to be unfair in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant committed the crime of embezzlement of this case with full trust relationship with the bank in which he was on duty; (b) the amount of damage was a large amount (307,881,729 won); (c) the Defendant did not recover from the country immediately after the crime of this case; and (d) the Defendant had a long-term escape life, such as departure from the country to the country; and (b) other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the record, such as the background of the crime of this case, the Defendant’s age
Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.