beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.03.16 2018고단260

공갈등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendant entered into the Republic of Korea on March 28, 2014 with a short-term visit sojourn status of 90 days and stayed at the construction site, while staying there over 90 days, and the Victim C (50) is a person who hires a father at the construction site located in the Gu and America employed a father at the construction site located in D.

1. The Defendant, on July 2017, 2017, went to the construction site at the Gu-U.S., where the Defendant, who was a first-aid police officer, was able to carry out the work at the above construction site while the Defendant, while the Defendant was unable to carry out the work at the above construction site.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered from damage by telephone because he did not employ the Defendant around that time.

The assertion that “10 million won is not sufficient to be known.”

“The victim is aware of the fact that he/she has employed the illegal staying person as his/her father and prevents his/her father from entering the construction site before the construction site and report to the police and the immigration office.

A large number of tin-openers who live in the Gu and U.S.

“The victim is living in front of the field office”, and the victim is living in front of the field office.

We need to think about the importance, and if the inside is good, the width is also good.

I will find out how to do so.

Dispatching text messages, such as “........”

The term "accomage" was fluent.

Around July 10, 2017, the Defendant was delivered KRW 7 million in total to the criminal administration account in the name of the Defendant around July 10, 2017 from the person who suffered from fright drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant received property by threatening the victim.

2. The Defendant violated the Immigration Control Act, even though he/she was able to stay in the Republic of Korea within the scope of the sojourn status and the period of sojourn of a national of the People of the People of the Republic of China, entered the Republic of Korea on March 28, 2014 as a short-term visit on a short-term basis, and stayed in the Republic of Korea until January 30, 2018 after the lapse of June 26, 2014,

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Character messages;

1. Account transactions;

1. Information on foreigners staying in Korea;

1. A request from an investigative agency;