The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

1. On May 15, 2016, Defendant A: (a) around 22:10, the Defendant: (b) committed assault on the part of Defendant A, “E” in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, on the part of the police officers, etc. affiliated with the F District of the Eunpyeong Police Station in Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul; (c) when Defendant B was subject to a drinking measurement by G, etc., a police officer, etc., who belongs to the F District of the Eunpyeong Police Station in Seoul, the Defendant expressed his desire to read “Isson’s son’s son’s son’s son, son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on crime prevention and criminal investigation.

2. Defendant B arrested Defendant B on the date, time, and place set forth in paragraph 1, on the ground that his father obstructed the performance of official duties by police officers H, etc. belonging to the Seoul Bupyeong Police Station F District, etc., the Defendant assaulted Defendant B, “I am Y Ha, I am going to come to Y, I am now, I am going to come to Y’s head knife, I am to knife, I am the B’s knife part of H’s bridge, and assaulted Defendant B once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on crime prevention and criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of police officers damaged by violence;

1. Relevant legal provisions and the Defendants’ choice of punishment concerning criminal facts: The Defendants shall be punished by a fine under Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; and the selection of fines (i.e., confession, motive for crime, criminal

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;