beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.12.12 2016가단204742

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Defendant against Plaintiff A, KRW 9,619,963, KRW 1,00,00 for Plaintiff B, and KRW 500,00 for Plaintiff C and each of the said money.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Facts of recognition 1) The defendant is the Fcar between E and E (the "Defendant Vehicle").

On January 21, 2015, the insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the insurance period, including the following date and time of the accident. 2) On January 21, 2015, the driver of the Defendant vehicle (Lessee) G was driving at a speed of about 40 km per hour from the clof distance off to the viewing field of the two lanes in front of the exit area of Daejeon Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan City.

3) G changed the lane from the first lane to the second lane at the time, and turned the body of the Plaintiff A, which was unauthorized to the right side from the left side of the Defendant vehicle, into the left side of the front side of the Defendant vehicle, into the left-hand clicker (hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”).

(4) Plaintiff A received hospital treatment at H hospital during the period from January 21, 2015 to February 27, 2015, from the following day to May 19, 2015, due to the instant accident, for which Plaintiff A received hospital treatment in the IB hospital by suffering from injuries, such as divers, thaleing, thaleing, thaleing, and thaleinginging, staleing, etc., of an external wound-free one with no two open one. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 26545, May 19, 2015>

5) Plaintiff B is the spouse of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the children of Plaintiff A. [Facts without any dispute over grounds for recognition, A1-1 through A4-2, and evidence 1 through 4-15.

B. According to the above recognition that the defendant's liability to pay insurance proceeds arises, the driver of the defendant's vehicle caused the accident of this case by violating the duty of front-down and the duty of safe driving, and E is the holder of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and is responsible for compensating for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the injury. Thus, the defendant, who is the insurer, shall be liable

2. The negligence offset plaintiff is acknowledged to have been involved in the accident of this case while crossinging a road coming from the heart without permission. The plaintiff's negligence is the accident of this case.