2. The judgment follows: (a) the Defendants recognized all of their crimes; (b) agreed with the victims; (c) Defendant A received treatment due to depression; and (d) committed the instant crime with weak mental and physical disorder; and (b) Defendant B voluntarily surrenders to the police.

On the other hand, however, the defendants had the records of punishment several times for the same crime, and in particular, even during the period of repeated crime due to the last punishment, the nature and circumstances of the crime are not very good, and the risk of recidivism is also high, there is no particular change in circumstances after the judgment of the court below, and the circumstances favorable to the defendants appear to have been determined by the court below in consideration of all the factors in the records, such as the defendants' age, character and conduct, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendants' above assertion is not acceptable.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.