beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2015.04.13 2014고단1557 (1)

업무방해등

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won, and by a fine of 80,000 won.

Defendant

A and B shall be subject to the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 137"

1. Defendant A

A. On July 13, 2014, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Daegu Jung-gu, transferred the stolen goods to B by selling KRW 24,000 of the price at the G Heights meeting operated by B in Daegu-gu, by being aware of the fact that the stolen goods were stolen, in excess of 30km in the market price managed by the victim E.

B. Around July 14, 2014, the Defendant acquired stolen goods with knowledge of the fact that it was a stolen stolen article equivalent to approximately 30 km of the market price managed by the victim E, which he stolen from D from the above Defendant’s house.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in water trading in the name of Daegu Jung-gu in the middle-gu in order to be a Ghandsium.

On July 11, 2014, the Defendant purchased approximately KRW 70 km from the market price under the control of the victim E, which was stolen by D from A at the above top of the water level.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to confirm whether the defendant, who is engaged in the sales business on the water, has a duty of care to confirm and describe the personal information A, while checking the process of acquiring a clean lamps, the motive for the sale, and the price suitable for the transaction price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting such care and neglecting the judgment on the stolen, purchased the relevant clean lamps in approximately KRW 60,000 by negligence.

B. Around July 13, 2014, the Defendant purchased approximately KRW 30 km from the market price under the control of the victim E, which was stolen by D from A at the above top of the water level.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the sales of solid assets, shall verify and describe the personal information A, while the duty of care to verify whether the defendant is stolen by properly examining the details of the acquisition of the clean lamps, the motive for the sale, and the price suitable for the transaction price.