2. In full view of the fact that the crime of this case was committed by the Defendant using the diskettes and loudspeaker on which the victim’s photograph is written, and thus, the nature of the crime is not good, and that it was not agreed with the victim, etc., the lower court’s sentencing appears to have been reasonably determined by fully considering all the circumstances, including the various sentencing grounds asserted by the Defendant, and there is no special circumstance to change the sentencing ex post facto. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.