However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On April 8, 2017, around 10:30, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the security service of security guards, including the victim C, who are employees of security service companies, and who interfered with the security service for one-hour security guards, by force, for one-hour security guards, including the victim C, who expressed a desire to keep the Defendant for the sake of protecting the safety of the players; and (b) interfered with the security service of the athletes, including the victim.

2. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph 1, and for the foregoing reasons, when he was arrested a flagrant offender from F, a slope E, or a policeman belonging to the Busan Police Station D District of the Busan Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report on the said reasons, and committed assault, such as being pushed in F with arms, cutting off F with a patroler, and cutting off the Bridge E on the bridge of the slope E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the handling of police officers' reports and legitimate execution of duties concerning arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (on-site conditions, etc.), - photographs of damage, investigation reports (to hear victim C telephone statements), and hearing of statements by the Escort G telephone service for investigation reports);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are as follows: The scope of the final sentencing due to the aggravation of multiple crimes for which there are no basic areas of crimes (a) (a) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f (f) (f) (f) (c) (f (f) (f) (f) (f (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) (f