beta
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.02.21 2017고단3993

횡령

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around Mar. 1, 2017, operated a car in the Guri-si, the Plaintiff: (b) on July 11, 2016, the auditor in charge of the Li-ri-ri-ririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririririri-ririririririririth (200,800,0000,000 won for personal loan for 20,10000,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to G;

1. Statement made by the police with H and E;

1. An agreement on automobile lease;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (referring to investigation into the Incheon Customs Office 3 and I telephone conversations), investigation report (in charge of risks of meribs Capital), investigation report (in addition to I telephone investigation by the Incheon Customs Office 1), investigation report (in other words, motor vehicle damage price, i.e., embezzlement amount), and investigation report (in addition

1. Relevant legal provisions on criminal facts, Article 355(1) of the Criminal Act on the selection of punishment, Article 355(1) of the Criminal Act, the Defendant’s reason for sentencing of sentencing of imprisonment with prison labor, and the vehicle of the judgment seems to have been seized by the customs office and returned to the victim. The benefits that the Defendant actually acquired due to the instant case are causing 18 million won. Meanwhile, in light of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime and the degree of damage, etc., the crime is not less complicated; the Defendant did not comply with the demand of an investigative agency to appear in accordance with the instant criminal complaint, and was arrested and detained, and there was a record that the Defendant was punished by a fine for embezzlement around August 2015.