Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

The facts charged were revised to the extent that it does not infringe on the defendant's substantial right of defense.

On April 30, 2018, the Defendant assaulted the victim D(38 years of age, women) and the victim's chest part of the chest in the first floor inside the building "C" located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si B, with the victim's chest.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. Partial statement of witness G;

1. Some statements in the police statement of H [in a case where the victim’s statement supporting the facts charged is generally consistent and consistent with the facts charged, it shall not be rejected without permission unless there is any other evidence to deem credibility objectively, from the objective point of view, (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2012Do2631, Jun. 28, 2012). The victim witness D, a witness, is relatively clear and consistent with the purport that “the defendant has pushed down his chest from the investigative agency to the court” to the effect that “the defendant has pushed down his chest.” The contents of witness E’s testimony are consistent with the contents of the victim’s statement, and are not consistent with specific, consistent, inconsistent, and contradictory. In addition, F, G, and H at the time, did not appear to be a place where the defendant was pushed down the victim at that time, but the victim’s statement was committed on the same day, and there is no inconsistency with the contents of the victim’s statement that the defendant did not have any credibility in the victim’s exercise of evidence.

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of a fine for the crime, and the selection of a fine for the crime;