2. The crime of this case, even if the defendant borrowed a car from the victim operating a siren, by deceiving the victim that he takes the vehicle only one day without the intention to return it, and preventing the defendant from grasping the location of the defendant by stating other numbers than the mobile phone number of the defendant in the vehicle lease contract. In full view of the fact that the nature of the crime is very poor, and the motive of the crime of this case and other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the age-oriented environment of the defendant, are considered as having reached an agreement with the victim, even if the court below's punishment was to be reversed, the defendant's assertion is not acceptable.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.