임금 등
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. Basic facts
A. The Defendant, under the trade name of “C”, engaged in the manufacturing of piping products.
B. The Plaintiff filed a petition with the Prime Minister of the Central and Central Labor Agency for overdue payment of wages, and the purport of the “business owner’s certificate, such as delayed payment of wages” (Evidence A) signed by the labor inspector on November 29, 2006 is that the Defendant delayed payment of wages of KRW 1.8 million against the Plaintiff.
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, purport of the whole pleadings
2. Obligation to pay wages;
A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was employed by the defendant and worked at the "C" workplace, and the defendant did not pay the plaintiff wages of KRW 1.8 million, and the defendant is obligated to pay the plaintiff wages of KRW 1.8 million and delay damages.
On this issue, the defendant asserts that he did not employ the plaintiff.
B. The facts of the judgment as above and the evidence Nos. 2 and 3, together with the purport of the entire pleadings, are acknowledged as follows: (i) the defendant, as a manager of C, retired from his/her workplace from work as production worker from August 20, 2015 to October 15, 2015, the plaintiff did not pay 1.8 million won of the plaintiff's wages to the defendant as the charge of facts charged (violation of the Labor Standards Act) within 14 days from the date of his/her retirement without agreement on the extension of the due date between the parties; and (ii) the defendant stated that he/she recognized the facts charged at the first trial of the above criminal case (Scheon District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch of the Chuncheon District Court). Since the defendant was not convicted of a criminal judgment of conviction on August 24, 2017 in the above criminal case, the above judgment became final and conclusive as is on September 1, 2017, the defendant sought to the plaintiff for late 15, 2010 days following the date 10.