However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 19, 2019, at around 01:40, the Defendant, through Internet meetings, inflicted injury on the part of the victim B (the 43 years of age) who was the same elementary school as that of the Defendant at the Dong-gu, Seogu, Daegu, on the part of the Internet meeting, “if inside the Republic of Korea is contrary to mit mits or mits concerning the past, it may be buried at this meeting.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 257 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 32(1) and Article 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Litigation, etc. of Application for Compensation (the scope of liability for damages is not clear) is an unfavorable circumstance where the victim suffers serious injury.

However, the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's confession and mistake, the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime, the fact that the defendant appears to be a contingent crime, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, means and result of the crime, etc., shall be determined as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions specified in the arguments of this case.