아동복지법위반(아동유기ㆍ방임)
A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the victim B (year 11) and father-child relationship.
No person who protects a child shall abandon the child under his/her protection or neglect the basic protection, rearing, medical treatment and education, including food, clothing and shelter.
Nevertheless, from September 28, 2018 to October 15:00 of the same year, the Defendant: (a) was unable to find out the victimized child out of the house and leave the damaged child out of the house due to the reason that the victimized child would lose his or her bicycles; and (b) neglected and abandoned the victimized child by allowing it to live outside the house for seven days.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;
1. Reports on internal investigation (related to statements made by a specialized institution for child protection), reports on internal investigation (related to applications for interim measures), and reports on investigation (report on the confirmation of the receipt by a victim);
1. A specialized child protection agency (a summary of the case of abused children), the Defendant merely made a false statement about the time when the victimized child lost his/her bicycle, and the Defendant asserted that the victimized child was out of the house, and denied the charges. However, according to the evidence duly adopted by this court, the Defendant did not have any special interest in fostering the victimized child, such as the method of giving a warning to the victimized child, how the victimized child was out of the house, how the victimized child was out of the house, how the victimized child was out of the house, how the victimized child was out of the house, how the victimized child was out of the house, due to the 112 report, and the victimized child was handed over to the specialized child protection agency, and the Defendant did not find his/her own work, and it appears that the victimized child was living together with the Defendant until now. Nevertheless, the Defendant did not have any special interest in raising the victimized child, such as failing to comply with the request for counseling by the specialized child protection agency.