대여금
1. The Defendant: (a) from April 28, 2018, to Plaintiff A with respect to KRW 61,406,00; and (b) from April 28, 2018, to Plaintiff B with respect to KRW 27,470,00.
The issue of this case: Whether the amount paid by the plaintiffs to the defendant is a loan
1. The plaintiffs asserted that they lent money to the defendant without fixing the due date and interest, and that the defendant received money from the plaintiff as a donation, and that the plaintiff borrowed 26,594,700 won by using the plaintiff's marina account from the plaintiff B, and that the remaining claim amount of the plaintiff B was donated.
2. Facts of recognition and judgment
A. The plaintiff 1) was the defendant's head, Eul 2, 0. 0. 2, 0. 10 to 10. 8, 20. 4, 0. 0, 20. 10 to 10. 5, 20. 10, 00 Gap's head, 20. 10, 20. 10, 10, 205 Gap's head, 20. 10, 10, 40. 10, 205, 20. 10, 10, 205, 20. 10, 205, 20. 10, 10, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 200, 105, 204, 205. 10, 205, 2014
3 From January 31, 2015 to February 20, 2018, Plaintiff B paid KRW 192,070,000 in total to D’s account managed by the Defendant or the Defendant, and received KRW 164,60,000 from the Defendant.
Each transfer shall include the following phrases:
Evidence No. 2-1 of the film transfer price A, No. 9, and evidence No. 9 of the 2015, Feb. 23, 2015, which was paid in lump sum, shall be 3,00,000,000 for the transfer of the money that was paid in lump sum, as of January 31, 2015; and No. 2-1 of the Company Operation Fund A of March 23, 2015.