가. 인정 사실 1) 피고는 2009. 8. 말경 울산 남구 C에 있는 D 출입문 앞에서 사실은 원고가 통장과 도장을 훔쳐서 돈을 빼간 사실이 없는데 동네 주민들인 E, F, G이 듣는 가운데 원고에게 “내 돈 70,000,000원을 훔쳐간 년이 여기 있네. 이 도둑년아, 내가 병원에 입원해 있을 때 니가 병원에 와서 내 좃을 만져서 내 정신을 혼미하게 만들고, 베개 밑에 있던 내 통장과 도장을 훔쳐가서 돈을 빼가지 않았냐.”라고 말함으로써 공연히 허위사실을 적시하여 원고의 명예를 훼손하였다(이하 이 사건 불법행위라고 한다

(2) On March 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1,00,000 for defamation in the Ulsan District Court 2014Da7499 regarding the instant tort, and the Defendant’s appeal against the said judgment is currently pending in the appellate trial as the Ulsan District Court 2015No322.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 10 (including provisional numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

B. Since the Defendant rendered the instant tort against the Plaintiff, it is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages suffered by the Plaintiff.

2. Scope of liability for damages

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) operated the Hphilosophical hall. The sales of KRW 19,442,300 decreased due to the instant tort. 2) The Plaintiff suffered emotional distress due to the instant tort.

3) Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff damages amounting to KRW 30,000,00 (main cause of claim: KRW 19,442,300, KRW 10,557,700, KRW 30,000, KRW 30,000, KRW 30,000, KRW 30,000, KRW 19,4442,30, and KRW 19,557,70, and KRW 300, respectively) and damages for delay.

2 The Plaintiff suffered emotional distress due to the instant tort.

(e).