If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 8, 2015, around 11:15, the Defendant demanded that the D Medical Center No. 1 in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and the D Medical Center No. 1 in Cheongju-si, and the F, the Defendant’s f, who was put by the victim E, who was the director of the Gnean division, undergo the Defendant’s dementia symptoms. However, the Defendant demanded the Defendant to provide hospital treatment as a result of the Defendant’s request for the symptoms of dementia. However, whether the Defendant was hospitalized or not, the Defendant demanded that “the Defendant would be given a priority to the determination of the head of the relevant place after receiving the diagnosis and treatment.” The Defendant was able to have the Defendant hospitalized in the Gnean-si, which is called “a request to be hospitalized in the Gnean-si.”

Accordingly, the victim avoided the defendant and went out of the clinic, and the defendant laid the chair on the floor, and entered the clinic, thereby putting the victim's losses, and assaulting the victim by breathing the breath's breath, and breath's hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to arrest and report cases;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that "the defendant did not engage in any act such as the statement of facts constituting a crime (in particular, the purport that there is no trace of the victim's flab by putting the victim's flab or flab by flabing the flab), but the defendant's hand in the course of resisting the victim's refusal of medical treatment and non-performance of the duty to explain does not contact the victim's chest, but it constitutes a legitimate act, which does not go against social rules, and thus, is dismissed."

2. The most basic concept of social norms is that Article 20 of the Criminal Act provides that acts that do not violate social norms shall not be punished.