A. The following facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence 2-1 to 27, Gap evidence 3, and Gap evidence 6, fact inquiry results on the Young-gu Saemaul Savings Depository of this court, and the whole purport of arguments in the order to submit financial transaction information.

1) On May 11, 2012, the Plaintiff is entitled to each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

(B) purchase of the instant real estate from B (33,481/47,736 shares) and the Defendant (14,255/47,736 shares) in KRW 600,000,000 of the purchase price (hereinafter “the instant sale”).

(2) At the time of the instant sale, the Plaintiff paid the down payment and the first intermediate payment of KRW 50,00,000 on the date of the contract, and the second intermediate payment of KRW 150,000,000 on each real estate listed in the title of the Youngdong Community Depository in the name of the debtor and the attached list 14 through 27 on each real estate: The secured obligation of KRW 150,000 on each real estate listed in the title of the Youngdong Community Depository in the name of the debtor and the attached list 14 through 27 on each real estate of this case (the debtor) shall be replaced by the acquisition of the secured obligation of KRW 150,00,000 (the debtor each of the debtor's 75,00,000,000 on November 30, 2012). At the same time, the Plaintiff agreed to receive documents necessary for the registration of ownership transfer from the seller.

3) Meanwhile, on May 21, 2012, in order to secure the right to claim for ownership transfer registration based on the instant sale, the Plaintiff filed a provisional registration under Section B and the Defendant’s order (hereinafter “instant provisional registration”).

was followed by the procedure.

B. According to the facts of the above recognition, the Defendant, barring special circumstances, is obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership based on the provisional registration of this case with respect to the Defendant’s share of 14,255/47,736 among the instant real estate pursuant to the instant sales contract to the Plaintiff, except for the following reasons:

2. As to the defense, etc.

A. The defendant's defense of cancellation 1.