beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.08.11 2015고정1245

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a non-registered driving vehicle.

A. On January 9, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 20:50 and proceeded to the right-hand left-hand turn to the left-hand turn at the front of Ulsan-dong, Ulsan-gu at the front of the B at the front of the front of the front Tri-distance.

Since there is an intersection where a signal apparatus is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle so that it does not interfere with the traffic of other vehicles by reducing the speed and properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of neglecting the duty of care at the front place and neglecting the duty of care at the front place, the victim C (16 years old) who was driving in the front place of the Da-wheeled vehicle operated by the victim C (16 years old) was faced with the front part of the vehicle in front of the Do-wheeled vehicle and suffered the victim's injury such as two open 15 days in need of medical treatment.

B. The owner of a motor vehicle violating the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle that is not covered by mandatory insurance, but the Defendant was driving the motor vehicle with the registered wheels from the front of the restaurant in which the trade name in the defense Dong-dong, Ulsan-gu cannot be known at the time specified in the preceding paragraph to the front of the same Gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect C by the police;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of the notified legislation without registration;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (referring to the injury caused by occupational negligence due to traffic accidents), Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, and the main sentence of Article 8 (referring to the operation of a vehicle which has not mandatory insurance) concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each fine;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order.