The defendant shall be subject to the protection observation for a period of one year and observe the protection.

The Defendant found the Defendant, on July 4, 2017, at around 01:02, who was reported on July 4, 2017, that the Defendant was a principal offender in the E-distance located in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju Northern Police Station F District, G, and Habing the Defendant, called the Defendant to the Dong-dong Police Station in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju, and moved the Defendant to the Dong-gu, Gwangju at his request. The Defendant, at around 01:23, 01:23, said G was called as “I son.........” The Defendant, at the seat of the Dong-dong Police Station located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant: (a) taken a bath to G; (b) taken a drinking alcohol once, and (c) taken a drinking alcohol; and (d) taken a drinking alcohol once, and (d) taken a drinking alcohol. The Defendant called the Defendant at the seat of the Dong-dong Police Station in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by public officials on the handling of reported cases, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to H and G;

1. Medical opinion [The defendant and his defense counsel held that the defendant was in a state of mental and physical loss due to physical disorder, etc. at the time of committing the crime;

However, according to the records, even though the defendant is deemed to have weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to stimulative disorder, etc., he/she cannot be seen to have lost his/her ability. Therefore, the above assertion shall not be accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 10 (2) and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate mental and physical drugs;

1. The reason for the suspended sentence under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act: The Defendant’s act should be subject to criticism for six months of the suspended sentence: Provided, That the Defendant’s act should be punished, but the depth of the error is divided, the polar disorder suffering from the suffering, etc., affects the crime, and continue to exist after the crime.