If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

No one shall provide game products, the details of which are different from those of the rating, for distribution or use, and shall exchange, arrange for exchange or repurchase the results of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products, or conduct business of repurchase.

Nevertheless, the Defendant provided illegally altered game products to customers, and had the intent to operate a speculative game site exchanging game money in cash from November 10, 2012 to December 21, 2012. D operated by the Defendant from around the previous week to around December 21, 2012, upon deliberation of the contents of the user’s acquisition of points by manipulating the character on the screen with the gold class appearing on the screen by manipulating the character on the screen, the Defendant changed the “scambling” of a gold class, which was rated as a whole for use, different from the contents of the classification, and changed the “scambling” of a gold class, which was classified as a “scambling game” differently from the contents of the classification, regardless of the game user’s ability or skill, the Defendant installed the game machine 49 games in the above game room and provided it to many unspecified customers, and provided them with merchandise coupons for use by 10% to customers in cash.

As a result, the defendant provided game products with contents different from the rating and carried out activities for exchanging game products as a result of the business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Seizure records;

1. Review of the result of enforcement support;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on gift coupons;

1. Article 45 of the relevant Act on criminal facts and Articles 32 (1) 2, 30 (a) and 44 (1) 2, 44 (1) 2, and 32 (1) of the Act on the Selection and Promotion of Game Industry for which punishment has been imposed;