If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

No one shall repeatedly send any codes, text, sound, image, or motion picture that arouses fear or apprehension through an information and communications network to any other person.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) around 16:09 on June 24, 2015, the Defendant: (b) was the victim D and the Defendant (hereinafter “E”) to the victim as a conversation name “E” in the Kakao Stockholm Stockholm.

F) From that time, F sent the word “Ausba”, from that time, to 16:37 of the same day, sent letters in total 14 times by 2,3,5,6,8,11, 13, 15, 16, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, and 25, as shown in the list of crimes in the separate sheet of crimes.

In addition, the Defendant, at a place where it is not possible to know the location around 09:51 on June 25, 2015, issued to the victim’s cell phone Kakao Stockholm, “E” in the victim’s cell phone name “E”, and the victim’s cell phone Kakao Stockholm, “I am you am you see. I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am I am and I am. I am I am.

In 70 years old and 70 years old, transmission was made of the word "a pair of cases in which the telephone could not be hidden" in this situation.

Accordingly, the Defendant repeatedly sent a letter that arouses fears and apprehensions through information and communications network to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A criminal investigation report (a copy of the Kakao Stockholm text shall be attached);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 (Selection of Penalty) of the Act on Promotion of Utilization of Information and Communications Network and Information Protection, etc., concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;