beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.03.08 2017가단5143307

위자료

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

가. 피고 B(보호자 피고 C)은 2007. 1. 17. 수원중부경찰서에 원고를 상대로 ‘원고가 2006년 10월 4일-10월 31일까지 매일 가슴을 만지고 빠는 등 추행을 했으며, 11월 1일-11월 5일까지는 매일 성기를 만졌으며, 11월 17일-12월 11일까지는 가슴을 빨고 성기를 만지는 등 추행을 계속해왔고, 12월 12일에는 오전에 방에서 가슴을 빨고 성기를 삽입, 12월 12일-12월 27일까지는 샤워하면서 성기를 삽입, 2007년 1월 1일 20:00-21:00시에는 방에서 가슴빨고 키스를 했고, 1월 2일-1월 6일까지는 샤워하면서 가슴빨고 성기를 삽입한 행위’에 대하여 처벌해달라는 고소장을 제출하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “instant complaint”). B.

On February 7, 2007, the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office prosecuted the plaintiff (U.S. District Court 2007Gohap60) for the crime of rape and bodily injury resulting from violation of the Juvenile Protection Act (Juvenile Rape) on the crime committed on February 77, 2007, and revoked the prosecution on the 74 criminal facts in the trial process.

C. The Suwon District Court had expressed a desire with Defendant B on June 13, 2007. However, it did not accept the Plaintiff’s defense lawsuit against the extreme denial of the crime that there was no fact that Defendant B’s milching sching, chest or sching with Defendant B did not meet or attempt to sexual intercourse.

1. On October 17, 2006, at the house of Defendant B (Inn, 13 years of age) located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and around 17:00, at the house of Defendant B (Inn, 13 years of age), the Defendant B made a bad appearance, stating that the Defendant B was able to have the Defendant B’s hand, refusing it, and indicating that “the Defendant B was able to get the Defendant B, who was frighted, off the clothes, take the bath for the bath, and show a shower, without disregarding the horses of Defendant B, who did not want to do so; and thus, the Defendant B’s milbs were forced by force by drinking the milbs of Defendant B;

2. Defendant B at the same place around 17:00 on December 12, 2006.