However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 12, 2015, around 04:30 on March 12, 2015, the Defendant, within the main point of “D” located in Busan Jin-gu C, Busan, not paying the drinking value, and made customers avoid disturbance, such as paying the drinking cost.

The Defendant, upon receiving the report 112, assaulted the Ferbucks, fbucks and shoulders from the main point of the Defendant, and obstructed the police officer’s 112 report performance of duties and the investigation of the instant case at the entrance of the Busan Busan Police Station located in Busan Jin-gu, by assaulting the Ferbucks, tacks, tacks, and tacks, from the entrance of the Busan Police Station, the Defendant continued to interfere with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning handling reports and investigation of the instant case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Application of each police protocol to H and I;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., the degree of violence exercised by the defendant, the amount of fine exceeding the amount of fine to the defendant, and the fact that the defendant is treated as symptoms, such as depression, etc.) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200Du1488, Apr. 14, 200).