However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 23, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of ten months of imprisonment with prison labor due to habitual gambling at the Incheon District Court on October 23, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 4, 2014.

1. On November 2009, in order to purchase a small-scale multi-household house, including a name-free box C, D, and D’s fraud, in the name of the so-called “sub-party purchaser,” such as the old-party, etc., by using water, and then purchase it under the name of the so-called “sub-party purchaser,” such as the old-party, etc., at a financial institution as a security, a business contract is prepared, and a real estate brokerage office receives a certificate of market price equivalent to the above sub-party trading price from the real estate brokerage office. On the other hand, as it is found that the sub-party would receive a regular benefit while working at the workplace, he/she was taken a loan by deceiving the financial institution by preparing and submitting a false employment certificate to the buyer, employment income withholding receipt, etc., and then, some of the loans were divided into two categories according to the roles of each party and offered the remainder of real estate in order to have the actual purchaser.

According to the above public offering, C has the role of preparing documents necessary for lending, such as securing a sub-party purchaser and preparing documents such as a false certificate of employment, receipt of tax withholding for wage and salary income, and making it available to a certified judicial scrivener office that prepared an application for the loan. D confirmed the appropriate amount of sales price to be stated in the business contract, and notified C of it after informing the sub-party purchaser of it, and made it available to the loan manager of the financial institution.

According to the above public offering, C was the Defendant, on the ground that he was the buyer F on the ground of the 3-301 unit E-Ba, Maga 301, 2009, and was purchased from the Defendant at KRW 55 million.