except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, in fact, did not have any authority, such as ownership, with respect to B large 291 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”), and did not directly participate in the project to develop the instant land, and did not hear the horses that invested KRW 400 million from the land C, which would bring profits to KRW 500,000,000,000, and did not receive the investment money from the victims by making a false statement in a manner that the Defendant had a share in the instant land and directly participated in the land development project.

Accordingly, around 18:00 on October 18, 2017, the Defendant shows the studio design drawings of Ecafeteria located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D and 3rd floor, F, G, or the land of this case, and the victims “it has been 1/3 of the equity interest in the land of this case and 300 million won has already been invested, and the total amount of KRW 1.5 billion has already been 1.5 billion from completion of construction to 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 200 million from 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 200 million from 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 1.6 billion from SH to 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 1.5 billion from 1.3 billion from 1.5 billion from 10.8 billion from 1.3 billion from 1.

Accordingly, the defendant was given a total of KRW 200 million by deceiving the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement statement by H and J is a statute.