A. The punishment of the lower court (unfair imprisonment for eight months) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unfair.

2. A favorable circumstance is that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, the victim I, C, and the victims were not punished by the Defendant.

On the other hand, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes during the suspended execution period due to the same crime of interference with business, etc., and committed each of the instant crimes in several times and in a short period of time is disadvantageous.

There are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that can be newly considered by this court, and in full view of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.

The defendant and prosecutor's assertion are not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is groundless, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.