2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16090, Jan. 1

Any corporation that intends to provide the security service only may provide the security service and any corporation that intends to provide the security service shall obtain permission therefor from the commissioner of the competent district police agency with specifying such service.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission from the commissioner of the competent district police agency from February 15, 2013 to May 13, 2015, operated a mutual security enterprise called "C" in Goyang-dong, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and entered into a contract with approximately 1,000 companies, such as (D) Does, located in both States, and installed CCTV, and operated a mechanical security business in a manner that contacts the police station, fire station, or subscribers in the event of fire, theft, fire, fire, fire, fire, or accident by analyzing the received CCTV.

Summary of Evidence

1. The police interrogation protocol and statement of the accused;

1. A written petition;

1. Each service use contract and business registration certificate [the defendant's business does not constitute security business. However, according to the above evidence, the defendant can recognize the fact that the defendant has operated such business as stated in the facts charged, and according to Article 2 subparagraph 1 (d) of the Security Services Industry Act, the mechanical security business refers to the business of receiving information reduced and transmitted by an apparatus installed in a facility subject to security service from a control facility installed in a place other than the facility subject to security service and preventing risks such as theft, fire, etc., and the business recorded in the facts charged is deemed to fall under the mechanical security business as stipulated in the above law].

1. Relevant Articles 28 (2) 1 and 4 (1) of the Security Services Industry Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;