1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is an oriental medical doctor operating “Chanwon” located in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant is a person who received from the Plaintiff both knee, knee, fel, and fele, etc. from July 15, 2014 to September 5, 2014.

나. 피고는 2014. 7. 15. 양측 무릎의 통증을 이유로 원고 한의원에 내원하였고, 2014. 8. 13. 왼쪽 곤륜혈 발목 주위 가운데 아킬레스건과 복사뼈 사이의 움푹 들어간 함요처에 존재하는 혈위 [당사자 간 다툼 없는 사실] 에 침 치료(이하 ‘이 사건 시술’이라고 한다)를 받았는데, 2014. 8. 18. 왼쪽 발등 부위의 감각이 떨어지고 왼쪽 곤륜혈의 통증을 호소하였으며, 이후 2014. 9. 5.까지 원고 한의원에서 치료를 받았음에도 불구하고 증상이 호전되지 않았다.

C. Accordingly, the Plaintiff recommended the Defendant to undergo a medical examination, and on September 24, 2014, the Defendant was also subject to the rehabilitation department of the D Hospital. On October 8, 2014, the Defendant was diagnosed on the condition that, based on the fibula, and the fibula’s f.m., and the f.co.kr’s f.m. w.kr’s w.m. f.co.kr’s f.m.) from the two boness of the f. F.m. 16th, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the f.m.’s f. s.m. s. s.m. s. n.m.’s f. f.m. f.m.’s f. f. f.m.’s f. f.m.’s f.’s f.m.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3 and Eul evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3, the whole purport of the pleading

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The summary of the cause of the Plaintiff’s principal claim ① In general, in cases of fluoral treatment on his body, it contains a certain degree of risk in itself, and in cases of fluoral surgery existing on the part of the body, such as fluoral blood, reproduction, bones, hair, etc., including fluoral blood, the procedure in this case was performed, it is exposed to the nephal and fluor’s fluoral f