beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.07.05 2016재나95

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, ..

Reasons

1. Notwithstanding the fact that a lawsuit for retrial in this case was dismissed and finalized in several courts on the same ground, it would result in bullying by the other party, and further, it would be unnecessary to use judicial personnel, barring any special circumstance, and such lawsuit is not permissible as it abuse of jurisdiction (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2005Da303, Nov. 10, 2005). Thus, it is evident that the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit for retrial (Ulsan District Court 2010Na86, Ulsan District Court 2011Na69, Ulsan District Court 201Na86, Ulsan District Court 201Na86, Ulsan District Court 2012Na394, Ulsan District Court 2012Na394, Ulsan District Court 2013Na392, Ulsan District Court 2014, Ulsan District Court 2014Na13238, Ulsan District Court 204 or 25 U.

Therefore, there is no special circumstance that the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit in the instant case and should have the right to protection. Thus, the lawsuit in the instant case constitutes an abuse of the right to file a lawsuit, and thus, the lawsuit cannot be allowed.

2. As such, the lawsuit of this case is unlawful and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.