2. Although the judgment of the court below is recognized as a situation where the defendant arbitrarily laid down a large amount of harmony within the development restriction zone for a long time, considering the following factors: (a) the defendant committed a crime and commits a crime; (b) the defendant has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime; (c) the defendant is an ordinary recipient as provided by the National Basic Living Security Act; and (d) the defendant's character, conduct, occupation and environment; (d) the process and consequence of the crime; and (e) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment of the court below is appropriate, and it is not unreasonable and unreasonable because

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.